• Implied fealty pledges or “buyout” resignations

• They are being asked to edit and redact publications compromising public health & safety

• Urge representatives to intervene and hold hearings

​

Legality of the Firings:

A central point of contention is the legality of the mass firings, particularly those involving probationary employees. A federal judge has ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) exceeded its authority in issuing directives that mandated these firings.  

Specifically, Judge William Alsup found that OPM lacked the statutory authority to order agencies to terminate probationary employees. This ruling highlights a challenge to the administration's methods of workforce reduction.

​

Impact on Federal Workforce and Services:

The mass firings have affected numerous federal agencies, including those responsible for critical services like weather forecasting (NOAA), national parks, and public health (CDC).  

Concerns have been raised about the potential disruption of essential government functions and the loss of experienced personnel.

​

Concerns for Probationary Employees:

There is particular concern for probationary employees, who have fewer civil service protections than career federal workers.  

Lawmakers and unions have called for increased protections for these employees and have challenged the fairness of their terminations.  

​

Union and legal challenges:

Federal unions have filed lawsuits against the administration, claiming the mass firings are illegal. 

These lawsuits allege violations of due process and established procedures for reductions in force.